Some of the justices’ questions demonstrated that they did not all seem to fully understand how the industry legally conducts business. Here are a couple of examples.
A few weeks into the new Trump administration, it seemed appropriate to spend some time with the NSSF’s SVP for Government & Public Affairs, Assistant Secretary and General Counsel Larry Keane.
Twenty-five million – that’s the number of law-abiding Americans who over the past four years have decided to jump off the fence and fully exercise their Second Amendment rights by purchasing their first firearm.
Maybe the Veep should brush up on what the president is in fact allowed to do through executive actions under the Constitution while facing checks and balances as the Founding Fathers intended.
Since the lawmakers couldn’t make an end-run around the Court, their plan now is to “reimagine” it, not as a co-equal branch of government but one that’s subservient to the legislative branch’s whims.
It’s not surprising that Obama hack Dan Ashe would jump on board the wrong side of this issue and give weight to the anti-hunting activists pushing the measure. He has a track record of doing so that stretches back years.
Under a newly-announced policy, AG Bonta is increasing the fee charged to Californians who follow all the laws to purchase ammunition and undergo a background check, from one dollar to five dollars.
Harris didn’t address the question of confiscation and was only forced to respond later to criticism by former President Trump warning voters that if elected, the Vice President would have “a plan to confiscate everyone’s gun.”
Sen. Warnock smears the firearm industry before an agreeable Sunday morning talk show host while the firearm industry has been deeply-involved in making firearms inaccessible to those who cannot be trusted with them.
Vice President Kamala Harris made a seven-word demand over the weekend that could lead to the exact opposite of what
