As promised SNW commentator and legal wiz LKB convened an all-star expert panel last night. The topic was yesterday’s oral arguments in the Supreme Court in the matter of Garland v. VanDerStock. That’s the case challenging the ATF’s unilateral redefinition of what constitutes a firearm under the narrowly-worded language of the Gun Control Act of 1968.
Joining LKB were Independent Institute fellow Steven Halbrook, California Rifle & Pistol Association President Chuck Michel and NRA-ILA Director of Constitutional Studies Joseph Greenlee. These are three legal minds who have been working in the pro-2A space for decades and whose views on the matter at hand before the Court actually mean something.
This video will not only give you 33 well worthwhile minutes of analysis of the VanDerStok arguments, but the participants also look into their crystal balls to anticipate what other significant Second Amendment cases are headed the Supreme Court’s way in the near future. Enjoy.
Got less use for a YouTube account than I do for this video.
No thanks. Publish elsewhere.
You know you don’t need a YouTube account to watch the video, right?
It says to sign in to YouTube to prove I’m not a bot.
Turn your VPN off and it will play without the sign in requirement.
I recall when ‘Bruen’ was granted cert. that LKB was quite pessimistic on the outcome, based on the fact the Court slightly changing the question to be asked.
And we got so much more with the ‘one step too many’ ruling authored by Thomas.
I guess we’ll see when we see who authors the decision next June…