Some of the justices’ questions demonstrated that they did not all seem to fully understand how the industry legally conducts business. Here are a couple of examples.
The justices questioned if this case wasn’t a wholesale attempt to redefine Second Amendment rights altogether, and how Americans might be able to exercise their rights to keep and bear arms.
There’s only one problem with the Tiahrt amendment that prohibits ATF disclosure of gun trace data…it has no teeth. In other words, there’s no penalty for ATF violating the law, which they did as part of Biden’s war on guns.
A few weeks into the new Trump administration, it seemed appropriate to spend some time with the NSSF’s SVP for Government & Public Affairs, Assistant Secretary and General Counsel Larry Keane.
The plan published by the Bloomberg School’s “Consortium for Risk-Based Firearm Policy,” promotes the idea that gun ownership would be better treated as a privilege and not as a right guaranteed for all law-abiding citizens.
The Trace and Sentient’s game plan isn’t new, but it’s still maddening. American hunters helping their communities should be praised and assisted in ways that help them do even more.
Mexico President Sheinbaum threatened, “If they declare these criminal groups as terrorists, then we’ll have to expand our U.S. lawsuit,” to claim that U.S. firearm manufacturers are complicit in aiding narco-terrorist drug cartels.
But the most ridiculous commission member is Todd Lizotte, the President and CEO of Bold Laser Automation. He’s also the patent holder of microstamping technology and stands to reap a financial windfall if Massachusetts requires this unproven, technologically unfeasible requirement on firearms sold in the Commonwealth.
The previous administration wielded the ATF like a hammer against the firearm industry, turning the regulatory agency into one that punished and carried out a radical gun control agenda designed to diminish 2A rights.
Mexico’s lawfare attack was petitioned to the Supreme Court by Smith & Wesson after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit revived the case after it was dismissed by a lower federal court.
